I’m used to stories about American politicians making jaw-droppingly ignorant statements (death panels, anyone?), but now this?
I rarely post about politics on this blog, because (a) I write it for fun, and (b) political blogs mostly look like this:

But today I am inspired to blog for the first time in weeks after reading two articles about Canadian politicians making statements so absurdly uninformed I want to claw my eyes out.
1. Nova Scotia Conservative MP Gerald Keddy (East Coast, represent!)
Re: why farmers must hire migrant workers:
“Nova Scotians won’t do it — all those no-good bastards sitting on the sidewalk in Halifax that can’t get work.”
Yes, laziness must be the reason behind Canada’s growing unemployment. Certainly not complex social issues, or even, gasp, the recession!
He’s since apologized. Colour me unconvinced.
2. Saskatchewan MP Maurice Vellacott
Re: poor abortion access in Saskatoon:
“Pro-life feminists have also come to see abortion as part of a male agenda to have women more sexually available. With widespread abortion access, the male partner has come to think that he can blame the woman if she chooses not to have an abortion after an unplanned pregnancy.”
…
“Saskatoon’s doctors should be commended for the leadership they are showing by reducing the availability of abortion in our city.”
I. Don’t. Even. Know. Where. To. Begin.
A woman’s freedom to do what she wants with her own body is part of the male agenda? ‘Cause if bitches be gettin’ knocked up, how’s a brotha supposed to get laid, amirite? Down with the patriarchy! Bring on the unwanted babies!

This statement might make a nanoparticle of sense if women didn’t bear an uneven burden — financially and otherwise — for these bundles of joy undesired consequences of sex.
(via @megan_eb)
Moving on. Here’s hoping our next generation of politicians show more promise. The Canadian Federation of Students is holding its AGM this week. One motion on the table calls for the organization (which is supposed to democratically represent/be financially accountable to most Canadian students) to increase its media transparency.
From an open letter in the Varsity:
Freedom of the media is another essential element of our democratic society, and one that student unions should champion. Instead, far too often, the CFS and its member unions shut out media, threaten litigation, and maintain utmost levels of secrecy. However, the Kwantlen Student Association (Local 26) has motioned, on pages 17 to 18, to make CFS meetings “open to all campus media.” The Post-Graduate Students’ Society of McGill University (Local 79) says on pages 51 that media “scrutiny would serve either to reign in the litigious nature of the Federation Executive branch, or to justify such legal expenses.
When I sent a reporter to cover this event last year, he was told to turn off his camera, his video cam, and his recorder. His French counterpart was then told to stop live-blogging the motions. All this because, apparently, these journalistic mediums were not “part of the deal.” Pencils only, people!
The year before, this happened.
I know this won’t pass, but hope it will. The full agenda is available here, and you can watch Canadian University Press cover this year’s AGM on Twitter (we hope) at @emmagodmere.




















